Chapter 40B
Chapter 40B is a Massachusetts state statute designed to promote the creation of affordable housing by allowing developers to bypass certain local zoning bylaws in communities where less than 10% of the housing stock is affordable (as defined by state standards). Its primary purpose is to address the shortage of affordable housing by providing a mechanism for developers to build mixed-income projects (typically with a portion of affordable units and the rest market-rate) even if local zoning would otherwise prevent them. These affordable units are deed-restricted for long-term affordability and count towards a community's Subsidized Housing Inventory (SHI).
Developments under Chapter 40B are explicitly tied to the AMI categories. To count as affordable under 40B:
For homeownership developments, at least 25% of the units must be sold to households with incomes of less than 80% of AMI (Lower Income).
For rental developments, at least 25% of the units must be restricted to Lower-Income households (earning less than 80% AMI), OR at least 20% of the units must be restricted to Very Low-Income households (those earning less than 50% AMI).
History of Legislation
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40B, often referred to as the "Comprehensive Permit Law," was enacted in 1969. Its creation was a direct response to the escalating housing crisis in the Commonwealth, particularly the growing affordability gap and the widespread use of restrictive local zoning bylaws (like large minimum lot sizes or bans on multi-family housing) that effectively excluded low- and moderate-income households from many suburban communities. The state legislature recognized that local control over zoning was inadvertently leading to economic and racial segregation and hindering the production of much-needed affordable housing statewide.
The core intent of Chapter 40B was to provide a mechanism to circumvent these local barriers. It established a state-level override for local zoning in communities where less than 10% of their housing stock qualified as affordable. Under 40B, a developer proposing a project with a significant affordable component (typically 20-25% of units restricted for low- or moderate-income households) can apply for a "comprehensive permit" from the local Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA). If the ZBA denies the permit or imposes conditions that make the project "uneconomic," the developer has the right to appeal to the state's Housing Appeals Committee (HAC), which can overturn the local decision. This appeal mechanism, and the underlying 10% affordable housing threshold, put pressure on communities to either proactively plan for and permit affordable housing or face potential development proposals that could bypass their strict zoning.
Since its 1969 enactment, Massachusetts' Chapter 40B has seen key changes to better balance affordable housing goals with local concerns. Major refinements include stricter calculations for a community's 10% affordable housing threshold (Subsidized Housing Inventory or SHI), the introduction of "safe harbor" provisions to protect proactive communities, and an increased emphasis on good design and local integration for 40B projects. Regulations have also clarified the appeals process to the Housing Appeals Committee, set limits on developer profits, and boosted transparency, ensuring the law continues to effectively drive affordable housing production while addressing evolving needs and criticisms.
Impact
Since its enactment in 1969, Massachusetts' Chapter 40B has been the most significant driver of affordable housing production outside of the state's largest cities. Various sources indicate that approximately 60,000 to 70,000 total units have been produced under Chapter 40B. Of these, over 35,000 to 42,000 units are specifically restricted to households making less than 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI), fulfilling the law's core affordable housing mission. This represents a substantial portion of the affordable housing stock across the Commonwealth, demonstrating its effectiveness in increasing supply.
Beyond the raw number of units, Chapter 40B has had several other quantifiable benefits.
-
The law has spurred communities to actively address their affordable housing needs. The number of communities meeting the 10% affordable housing threshold has steadily increased over the years. Additionally, many more communities are now close to the threshold (e.g., at 8-9%) or have developed state-approved Housing Production Plans to achieve their goals, sometimes earning "safe harbor" from 40B appeals. This shows a proactive shift in local planning due to the law's influence.
-
The construction and ongoing operation of 40B developments generate significant economic activity, including job creation in construction and related industries, as well as indirect economic benefits from resident spending. Studies, such as this one from 2010 by the UMass Donahue Institute, have quantified these economic contributions. It shows 40B projects from 2000-2010 contributed $5.39 billion and 20,208 jobs to the MA economy directly through construction; $1.86 billion annually directly by spending of household members in 40B developments; and $61.8 million annually in property taxes, $93.7 million annually in state income taxes, and $22.8 million annually in sales taxes.
-
Chapter 40B has been instrumental in diversifying the housing options in many suburban communities, which historically relied heavily on single-family zoning. It has enabled the creation of multi-family rental and ownership opportunities that cater to a broader range of incomes and household sizes, fostering more inclusive communities.
-
By allowing for market-rate units alongside affordable ones, 40B projects attract private investment that helps finance the affordable components, reducing the reliance solely on public subsidies. This mixed-income approach makes affordable housing development more financially feasible for developers.