Chapter 40B Pros and Cons
Implications for the Commonwealth
Advantages
-
The most direct benefit is the creation of affordable housing units within the commonwealth. This helps address local housing needs, provides homes for lower and moderate-income residents (including essential workers, seniors, and young families), and can allow residents to remain in their community even as housing costs rise.
-
40B projects often introduce multi-family housing options into communities traditionally dominated by single-family homes, offering more diverse housing types that can appeal to different demographics and life stages.
-
Studies consistently show that at the state level, new housing development, including those facilitated by Chapter 40B, generate significantly more tax revenue (income, sales, corporate taxes) than any potential local revenue shortfalls. For example, a 2019 New Housing Production in Massachusetts: Fiscal Dynamics and Community Implications found that new housing development provides a net fiscal benefit to both municipalities and the state. This suggests a substantial overall positive fiscal impact for the Commonwealth.
Disadvantages
-
While the state views Chapter 40B as a necessary tool to overcome exclusionary zoning, many community members feel it overrides their ability to manage local development, infrastructure, and character. This can lead to protracted legal battles and strained relationships between the state and municipalities, sometimes resulting in communities feeling forced to accept developments they believe are ill-suited for their area, even if they meet the affordable housing criteria.
-
A significant portion (typically 75-80%) of the units in a 40B development are market-rate. While this makes projects financially viable for developers, some argue it's not the most efficient way to maximize the production of deeply affordable units directly subsidized by the state. Furthermore, the state can be perceived as sacrificing direct control over the specific location and design of all units within these projects, as long as the affordable component and other legitimate local concerns are addressed.
Implications for the Municipalities and Residents
Advantages
-
The most direct benefit for a municipality is the creation of affordable housing units within its borders, which directly addresses local housing needs. These units provide crucial homes for a range of residents, including essential workers, seniors, and young families, enabling them to remain in their community even as market-rate housing costs continue to escalate.
-
For communities below the 10% Subsidized Housing Inventory (SHI) threshold, 40B projects help them get closer to that goal. Reaching or maintaining the 10% threshold can provide the municipality with "safe harbor" from future 40B appeals, giving them more control over subsequent development. This advantage is amplified by the current Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities (EOHLC) policy to count both market and affordable units in the municipalities SHI for Chapter 40B rental projects.
-
40B projects often introduce multi-family housing options into communities traditionally dominated by single-family homes, offering more diverse housing types that can appeal to different demographics and life stages.
-
While often debated locally, Chapter 40B developments contribute to local tax revenues in two primary ways: through the significant increase in property taxes from pre-development land use to the fully developed project, and by bringing new residents whose economic activity generates additional revenue streams for the municipality.
Disadvantages
-
This is the most significant and frequently cited disadvantage. Chapter 40B can override local zoning bylaws (such as density limits, building heights, or setback requirements), leading to concerns that the community loses its ability to shape its own development and maintain its character.
-
Rapid or dense development, regardless of its affordability, can strain existing local infrastructure, including roads, water and sewer systems, and emergency services. Communities often worry about increased traffic congestion, crowded schools, and the capacity of public services to handle new residents. Traffic studies, evaluations of water and sewer capacity, and stormwater reports are regularly reviewed as part of the approval process to insure that developments do not overburden existing infrastructure, but these technical reports and assurance of consultants hired by developers do not often relieve the communities fears.
-
While there are state guidelines for design, residents may feel that 40B projects are out of character with the existing neighborhood's aesthetics or scale, particularly if local zoning design standards are not rigorous or well defined or boards don’t make good use of applying those standards during the permitting process.
-
While new residents pay taxes, communities frequently worry that the cost of providing services to new residents (especially school-aged children) may outweigh the property tax revenue generated by the development, leading to a negative fiscal impact on municipal budgets. Multiple studies have shown that this is not the case, including the 2024 MAPC Study of Housing Production’s Affect on Public School Enrollment, the 2016 Donahue Institute Study on the Costs and Hidden Benefits of New Housing Development in Massachusetts, and the 2019 Citizens’ Housing and Planning Association (CHAPA) sponsored Fiscal Dynamics and Community Implications Study. However, the uncertainty felt by the community is real and if unaddressed can lead to lasting negative sentiment.
-
The 40B application and appeal process can be lengthy, contentious, and resource-intensive for local Zoning Boards of Appeal, town staff, and residents who participate in public hearings or appeals.
Implications for Developers
Advantages
-
The most significant benefit is the ability to bypass restrictive local zoning bylaws (like density limits, height restrictions, or minimum lot sizes) in communities that haven't met their affordable housing goals. This allows developers to build more units on a given parcel of land than traditional zoning might permit, which is crucial for making projects economically viable, especially in high-cost areas. Furthermore, the "comprehensive permit" process consolidates multiple local permits (e.g., zoning, subdivision, wetlands) into a single application to the local Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), theoretically streamlining the approval process and reducing the time and cost associated with obtaining numerous individual permits.
-
To qualify as a 40B project, the development must receive either funding or technical assistance from a state or federal housing program. Under this provision developers may be provided with access to an additional layer of financing (e.g., Low Income Housing Tax Credits, MassHousing loans, Affordable Housing Trust Fund dollars) that makes the affordable units, and sometimes the entire project, financially feasible.
-
While navigating local opposition can be challenging, the ultimate appeal mechanism to the state's Housing Appeals Committee (HAC) provides a backstop. If a ZBA denies a permit or imposes uneconomic conditions in a non-compliant community, developers have a path to potentially overturn that decision, reducing the risk of a project being entirely blocked by local resistance. This offers a degree of predictability that may not exist under conventional, purely local permitting.
-
The typical 40B structure, where a portion of units are affordable and the rest are market-rate, allows developers to use the profits from the market-rate units to offset the costs and lower returns associated with the deed-restricted affordable units. This mixed-income approach makes affordable housing development more attractive to private developers.
Disadvantages
-
Despite the streamlined permit process, 40B projects often face intense opposition from residents and municipal officials. This can lead to lengthy and contentious public hearings, extended review periods by ZBAs, and costly legal appeals, adding significant time and expense to the development timeline. Even if the project is ultimately approved, the "fight" can be draining.
-
Chapter 40B includes regulations that limit a developer's profit on the project, typically to a "reasonable" amount (e.g., 20% of equity for homeownership, 10% of equity per year for rentals). Developers are required to undergo rigorous cost certification processes to ensure compliance, which adds administrative burden and limits upside potential compared to purely market-rate projects.
-
While the permit process is comprehensive, developers still need to navigate a complex web of state and federal regulations beyond local zoning, including environmental laws, fair housing requirements, and the specific rules of the subsidizing agency. Compliance with these layers of regulation can be intricate and demanding.
-
While local zoning can be overridden, ZBAs can still impose reasonable conditions related to the site, design, and infrastructure that are not "uneconomic" or "unreasonable" given the regional need for housing. Developers often engage in extensive negotiations with municipalities to address local concerns, which can lead to compromises on project design or additional costs for amenities or infrastructure improvements.
-
Even with the appeal process, the outcome of a 40B application is not guaranteed. The Housing Appeals Committee evaluates each case based on its specific facts, and developers can still face denials or burdensome conditions if their proposal is deemed to genuinely outweigh the need for affordable housing or if they haven't adequately addressed legitimate local concerns. Additionally, the time and resources that need to be devoted to a lengthy appeal process can allow market conditions (building costs, interest rates, lending terms, etc.) to change to such a degree that a project that was economically feasible at the outset may become less so, or even impossible to finance once all the process is resolved.